I like that
Douglass and Harden mention Hitchcock’s Rear
Window near the beginning of the reading. Rear Window is about a news photographer confined to a wheelchair
after an accident during one of his assignments. Much of the film is tightly
framed, and all the events are seen from the point of view of the main
character’s living room. Jeffries (and the audience) is curious about what goes
on in the other apartments in his neighborhood but the camera never allows us
to see the inside of anyone’s home. Also, interestingly, many of the zooming
camerawork comes from the point of view of Jeffries’ telephoto lens, which
directly places us in the same point of view as the main character. The
camerawork has the effect of placing us in the emotional perspective of Jeffries,
feeling the same confinement to the little living space as he does.
I really enjoyed the last line of the reading – “Camera
technique is the creation of an illusion of reality that exists on the screen, rendered
and interpreted with all the photographic devices at our disposal.” It makes me
think of Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane,
which was also a film mentioned in the reading. The movie was filmed with
fisheye lenses and made constant use of low angles. The set pieces were also deliberately
disproportionate and spaced out. All of these aspects gave the film space its
fascinatingly isolating and oppressive look and feel, communicating to the
audience Kane’s isolation in a much more sophisticated way than outright in the
script. One of my favorite scenes in Citizen
Kane occurs when Kane has taken over a competing newspaper company and the
camera zooms in on a photograph of the newspaper’s employees, now in the hands
of Charlie Kane. There’s a very smooth transition between the photograph and a “real
life” shot of the journalists posing for a new photo, and the first time I
watched the film I didn’t even notice the transition and was mesmerized by the
magical quality of the image coming to life. It was a cheeky play on camera
equipment and technique and absolutely made me think about the wonder that
accompanied the spectacle of moving film in its early days.
No comments:
Post a Comment