In the fifty years since McLuhan penned “The Medium is the
Message,” we have borne witness to countless examples of the truth of this
conclusion. Particularly in news production, we have seen technological
advancements change and adapt to the rise of television and internet and social
media. We have seen fashion
(clothing, hairstyles, etc.) become a medium for political expression.
I think there is much to be said about the intrinsic ties
between consumerism and the notion of “medium as message.” A medium does not
exist as an ephemeral entity, it requires a product in order to be portrayed—i.e.
tweets need a product which supports internet, etc. Thus, as technology and
media have advanced, so too has the market for their platforms. Because of the importance not of what we say
but how we say it (the medium), there is little option but to conform to this
conflated communicative capitalist system—a cruel technological Darwinism. Moreover,
medium of message has been co-opted by industry in order to capitalize on the
growing trends of “slacktivism.” As Jodi Dean describes, “there is an easy coexistence with consumer capitalism insofar as
choices of fashion and entertainment could be quickly read as politically
significant. Antiracist? Wear a Malcolm X t-shirt. Gay-friendly? Fly a rainbow
flag.” These media have mitigated the responsibility of individuals to take
direct action. Instead, they can simply buy products which will purportedly say
just as much as any picket or protest would. However, such notions are
detrimental to impactful change because they don’t sufficiently trouble the
waters. Instead, they force even many “progressive” to market themselves for
their products [media] rather than their actions [message].
This is not meant to be an
incredibly techno-pessimistic or Luddite post. However, I do think it is
important to consider these factors and their implications on things like
content. For although the medium may portray an initial message, content still
has a responsibility, a purpose, an intent.
No comments:
Post a Comment