In the reading, the author wrote about the history about
video art and its pioneer-Nam June Paik. Video art as a combination of all
other kinds of art forms; it has been a topic for artists and critics. Although
the pieces of work could not always be recognized as a kind of art, artists
never stop pursuing it. Meanwhile, they may be questioned, such as Paik. It
reminded me of Marcel Duchamp. Duchamp used to learn drawing from an
unsuccessful teacher who attempts to protect Impressionism. Later, he added signature
to all his works and developed his own style of art. Paik experienced the same
thing in his life. There was a quote from it said that he sometimes could be criticized
as “sanctification”. “The American video artist and writer Martha Rosler
suggests that his Fluxus strategy of the importation of the television set into
the art world anesthetized its domestic function simply producing as ‘anti-art
art’. ” For his opinion, I did not really agree. Even Paik did not follow the
traditional rule of art. His work still presents some kind of emotions. They
also passed some kind of message to the audience. There was an example I found
on Toutube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aftng-G73Vc
The performer was giving a show on the street. At the same time, the reactions
of the audience were also captured into the camera. Whether they like it or
not, it existed for a reason. “What is rational is actual and what is actual is
rational.” As Hegel’s famous quote.
No comments:
Post a Comment